Critical0No critical risk currently overrides the headline score
High4Management action due
Moderate3Track and reduce
Open6One in progress
Risk Register
Assessment findings
RiskLevelFindingOwnerStatus
R-01HighCash headroomThe downside forecast falls below the internal headroom threshold when the next project is mobilised.Finance ManagerFinance ManagerOpen
R-02HighDelivery capacityOne proposed mobilisation is due within six weeks without confirmed project management and quantity surveying capacity.Development DirectorDevelopment DirectorOpen
R-03HighKey-person dependencyMaterial approvals and investor relationships remain concentrated with the Managing Director.Managing DirectorManaging DirectorOpen
R-04HighContinuityNo recent recovery test exists for the project and finance systems used to manage live developments.Office & People ManagerOffice & People ManagerOpen
R-05ModerateData consistencyFour live project trackers use different status, forecast and action definitions.Finance ManagerFinance ManagerIn progress
R-06ModerateSupplier variationsVariation information is sometimes recorded after the approval window, weakening cost control.Development DirectorDevelopment DirectorOpen
R-07ModerateAI governanceEarly AI use is not yet supported by an approved use-case register, data rules or review controls.Managing DirectorManaging DirectorOpen
Required Treatment
Evidence needed to control the four high risks
Cash headroomMitigateAuthorised 13-week forecast, downside test and an agreed headroom threshold.
Delivery capacityAvoid until readyNamed delivery capacity and an approved portfolio plan before mobilisation.
Key-person dependencyMitigateDelegated approvals, documented investor contacts and named deputies.
ContinuityMitigate and testDocumented workarounds, a successful restore test and closed actions.
!
Escalation rule
Any material deterioration in cash headroom, expected project margin or confirmed delivery capacity should trigger an immediate portfolio review.
